A recent Constitutional Court judgment highlights a fundamental difference in the legal protections afforded to two types of unlawful occupant –

Residential occupants:Occupants residing on premises are afforded protection in terms of PIE (The Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act) with its many onerous requirements for eviction.  Note that even residents of “commercial” property are covered – it is not the categorisation of property that counts, but whether or not the unlawful occupier resides on it.

“Commercial” occupants:  In contrast, “commercial” occupants (“juristic persons and persons that do not use buildings and structures as ‘a form of dwelling or shelter’”) have no such protection, and are accordingly (in principle at any rate) easier to evict.

The case in question concerned a mixed-use property which was sold on an insolvency auction.  The previous owners refused to vacate and the new owner asked the Court . . .